Saturday, November 28, 2009

Can you smoke medical marijuana if you have lung cancer

Can you smoke medical marijuana if you have lung cancer?
Is is safe to smoke medical marijuana if you have lung cancer. Could it help it or make it worse? Would it be better to smoke or have made in food?
Cancer - 9 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Smoking causes lung cancer..... moron.
2 :
no matter what you smoke won't help it inless ur the carrier of it. marijuana is marijuana and smoke is smoke and they =bad and can cause lung cancer so i say no.
3 :
no no no no no no no no no no no no. it will only make it worse if you smoke it and don't even chew you'll get mouth cancer. o and if its prescribed medicine then you'll have to ask your doctor
4 :
I am not for marjuana but....it has helped some cancer patients with appetite....pain...so in this case I would say yes. BUT medical marj has been abused by people that do not need it.I am sorry I could not help you...PLEASE research it on-line or with your oncologist. Have no clue whatsoever if smoked or in food makes a difference but if you should decide to do this food would be best for you...you have to take care of your lungs...cancer or not.
5 :
it will make it worse most likely. eat it. it's stronger that way with how your body breaks it down so any you have will last longer and be more effective for whatever you are using it to help with.
6 :
I would not recommend smoking, especially if you have lung cancer - unless you are going through palliative care only. I would suggest cooking it in food. That will remove the smoke issue, and also remove any issues of bacteria/chemicals/fungi that could cause infection, especially if you have a lowered immune system (smoking marijuana is just like eating unwashed fruit and veggies - not such a huge deal for a healthy person, but for someone going through chemo it could be an issue.)
7 :
Weed will help, but Dont SMOKE it, because ALL smoke is bad for your lungs. Just melt some butter, and add broken down weed to it. Let it simmer for about 5 minutes or a little longer just incase. Only on LOW heat. Add the butter to some brownie mix following the recipe.
8 :
Smoking is bad for your lungs regardless of the substance. It would be best for you to use a vaporizer or eat it.
9 :
This is said to be a difficult question to answer but it really isn't. Medical Marijuana can be used to treat all forms of cancer--including lung cancer. The fastest way to get it in your system is to inhale, HOWEVER (and this is the catch) you must not smoke, because smoke contains harmful carcinogens that not only cause lung cancer, but make it worse. How to do you past this? You use a vaporizer. A vaporizer's job is basically to heat your herb in order to release 100% of the THC in it's gaseous form. This is what you breathe in in order to treat your lungs. Note: Marijuana does not cause cancer, the released chemicals in smoke do. This is eliminated through the use of a vaporizer. Also, you save your already vaporized remains and either smoke it (done by most cancer patients when awoken with pain at 3 in the morning), or make edibles from it. You can also make Green dragon, which is vaporized MJ soaked in 150 proof alcohol, the green liquid can be used to lace your food when in pain but do not want to smoke. Hope this info helps...




 Read more discussions :

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

my mum is in icu has lung cancer and cancer of the adrenal glands we did not know

my mum is in icu has lung cancer and cancer of the adrenal glands we did not know?
My mum has been diagnosed with lung and adrenal gland cancer. I went to see her yesterday and dont think she will make it through the week. My question is how do you go to work with all this happening, how do you get through the day?
Cancer - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
oh my god, i feel for you! i went through the same thing with both parents. not the same illness, but still, they were dying. it was impossible to go to work everyday. i missed a lot of work, but luckily i worked for good people and was told to take as much time off as i need. i can't tell you how to get through it. you have to do that your own way. i cried a lot and got very, very angry. i am almost crying as i am righting this. my thoughts are with your mother, and you and your family.
2 :
Hello: J.W. I am sorry for you family. The cancers you just described she would have known how sick she was. Some people don't let on that they are ill expecialy women they don't want to worry there family so they don't get thing checked out for them self like they would if a child or husband said I hurt right here. Or something does not feel right. We women tend to not pay as much attention when we are sick. We are the care givers and not use to being taken care of. And no it is not easy when the person who you love is dying of cancer. They took care of the whole family now you feel like you should have taken care of her. Sorry but if she keept it to her self there is nothing you could have done. I hope your mom was a christian that why if you are at least you will have heart that you will see her in heaven. (I hope she was saved) My heart goes out to your whole family and my prayers are with you all. Carol
3 :
I would go to your boss and tell them the situation, and ask to be put on FMLA.




Read more discussions :

Friday, November 20, 2009

Can too much exposure of dust result in Lung Cancer

Can too much exposure of dust result in Lung Cancer?
Hi I work at this shredding company and we shred books, papers, magazines, etc. However, there is so much dust where I work. After my first day on the job I would sneeze dust. This is a concern to me because I don't want to end up with any serious illnesses due to the dust. I am only going to be working there for three months albeit I wonder if although it is a short period of time, is it possible to develop lung cancer?
Cancer - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Its possibly, can you wear a mask?
2 :
Cancer is not the biggest issue I would worry about. The chances of that are low from breathing in dust. On the other hand you can develop allergies and asthma. And something similar to black lung disease that coal miners would get from breathing in coal dust. I would definitely think about getting a mask.
3 :
According to the leading cancer research websites, cancer is caused by almost everything. My research on this question has revealed that the leading cancer research sites will tell you all the things that cause cancer and scary statistics, yet they fail to address what, about any of those things, actually causes cancer. The only thing that is actually known to cause cancer is radiation. So don't swallow any radiation sources and you should be fine. Dust isn't radioactive so I wouldn't worry if I were you.
4 :
No one knows what causes cancer and dust is not a risk factor, but why would you subject yourself to that? At least wear a mask. Call OSHA, something. You should know however, that many risk factors for several cancers tend to involve chronic irritation of tissues and this could be one of those situations.



 Read more discussions :

Monday, November 16, 2009

Medical studies supporting argument that smoking causes lung cancer

Medical studies supporting argument that smoking causes lung cancer?
Does anyone know the official title of any medical studies or trials that support the argument that smoking causes lung cancer? Also, if anyone knows of an article or example of why animal trials and human trials can have different results, that would be great. I have to research both sides of the debate about smoking and lung cancer.
Cancer - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
There really aren't "two sides" anymore, smoking causes lung cancer, but some people think the enjoyment is worth the potential risk. The biggest and most accurate human trial would be....mankind. If you look at the data concerning all the now-dead people born since 1900 that developed lung cancer, 10% of cases were in non-smokers, the rest were in smokers or ex-smokers.
2 :
You start the research on PubMed which is the online access to the US National Library of Medicine. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez/
3 :
Smoking causes lung cancer. 90% of lung cancer cases come from those who smoke. For more information on smoking and lung cancer visit the website i use for answering questions (website in source)
4 :
Ad this to your research. I was 16, never smoked in my life, yet had lung cancer. You can research it under Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma. only about 54 cases in the world. Yes smoking is a major contribution to cancer, but so is if you breathe in asbestos (there have been many cases of this all around the world) All the best!
5 :
If you want to get technical about it, no-one has ever proved that smoking causes lung cancer - no-one knows the exact process involved. There is a statistical correlation between smoking and lung cancer that is of a significant size, but not an actual cause as in A causes B by means of C. Passive smoking on the other hand is far more entertaining, I could give you chapter and verse on those studies... It's also worth looking at who funded the studies, and who funds the funders.



Read more discussions :

Thursday, November 12, 2009

I have small cell lung cancer and looking for help

I have small cell lung cancer and looking for help?
I am a 5? yr old female recently diagnosed with small cell lung cancer. I am desparately looking for message boards and/or chat rooms etc. where I can ask questions of those that have had it longer than I have, possibly answer some ?s that I may have experienced and interact with others that are living with sclc and possibly others that know of alternative treatments and/or meds that will help me with this battle. Thanx M.J.
Cancer - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Here is the listing for the ACOR SCLC listserv. It currently has 145 members who either have SCLC or are caregivers. ACOR maintains private lists for about 175 different types of cancer and cancer related issues. The lists are moderated to stop spam, etc. SCLC is a tough one so I highly recommend you join and also read the Archives which will be full of valuable info. http://listserv.acor.org/archives/lung-sclc.html I do not have SCLC but the treatment is exactly the same for the cancer that I do have so I know what you will be going through. I recently finished my second cycle of chemo after having had radiotherapy. good luck
2 :
I moderate the Yahoo group below. We have over 300 members.



Read more discussions :

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

What steps are necessary to diagnose lung cancer

What steps are necessary to diagnose lung cancer?
I have a friend whom says she has lung cancer. I actually don't believe her. She is only 42 yrs. old. She said she has the opinion of 3 doctors. My mom had lung cancer and she didn't know for sure till they did a biopsy. This friend hasn't had a biopsy. Is it possible to know you have lung cancer without a biopsy?
Cancer - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Diagnosing Lung Cancer To help find the cause of symptoms, the doctor evaluates a person's medical history, smoking history, exposure to environmental and occupational substances, and family history of cancer. The doctor also performs a physical exam and may order a chest x-ray and other tests. If lung cancer is suspected, sputum cytology (the microscopic examination of cells obtained from a deep-cough sample of mucus in the lungs) is a simple test that may be useful in detecting lung cancer. To confirm the presence of lung cancer, the doctor must examine tissue from the lung. A biopsy -- the removal of a small sample of tissue for examination under a microscope by a pathologist -- can show whether a person has cancer. A number of procedures may be used to obtain this tissue: Bronchoscopy. The doctor puts a bronchoscope (a thin, lighted tube) into the mouth or nose and down through the windpipe to look into the breathing passages. Through this tube, the doctor can collect cells or small samples of tissue. Needle aspiration. A needle is inserted through the chest into the tumor to remove a sample of tissue. Thoracentesis. Using a needle, the doctor removes a sample of the fluid that surrounds the lungs to check for cancer cells. Thoracotomy. Surgery to open the chest is sometimes needed to diagnose lung cancer. This procedure is a major operation performed in a hospital. ..........Lung cancer is difficult to detect early because symptoms usually do not appear until the disease is advanced. Symptoms depend on the location of the tumor and can include persistent cough, hoarseness or wheezing, shortness of breath, sputum streaked with blood, recurring bronchitis or pneumonia, weight loss and loss of appetite, and chest pain. Physicians use several techniques to diagnose lung cancer, including the following: Imaging Tests Chest x-rays, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) help locate abnormal areas in the lung. Low-Dose Helical CT A technique called low-dose helical (or spiral) CT may offer a novel approach for diagnosing lung cancer by exposing the patient to less radiation than a conventional chest CT scan while allowing the doctor to see areas of the chest normally obscured in a standard x-ray. Memorial Sloan-Kettering is now studying the effectiveness of low-dose helical CT in a clinical trial. Outside of New York, the National Cancer Institute has begun a multi-center study of the technology. Combined PET/CT Scans Memorial Sloan-Kettering's radiology department includes the best combined PET/CT imaging technology available in the United States. This is particularly important in imaging lung cancer, which can be difficult to identify on a regular CT. To address this situation, a PET (positron emission tomography) scan, which picks up the metabolic signal of actively growing cancer cells in the body, is run simultaneously with the CT scan. This improved imaging capability provides for superior treatment planning because the details of the tumor are better defined. Bronchoscopy & Biopsies A sputum sample can be analyzed for the presence of cancerous cells. Doctors may perform a bronchoscopy, which allows them to examine the bronchial passages using an instrument called a bronchoscope. This is a small tube that is inserted through the nose or mouth, down the throat and into the bronchi. During the procedure physicians may remove some tissue for analysis. A modified form of bronchoscopy called autofluorescence bronchoscopy, which can detect early invasive cancers not seen with standard x-rays or white-light bronchoscopy, is being used to detect very early lung cancer. To examine areas of the lungs that are not accessible during a bronchoscopy, physicians may perform a needle biopsy ("fine needle aspiration" or FNA) to remove a small sample of tissue for analysis.
2 :
here are the tests in step as they are done, X-ray, CAT scan, MRI and biopsy. A biopsy is necessary to check what kind of T-cell growth it is and what kind of malignancy it is.
3 :
the doctor needs to schedule you for either a ct chest with and without contrast and then possibly an MRI or PET scan. If the results are positive, then a bronch with biopsy is necessary. then doctor will then send the specimen over tot he lab for the pathologist to do a frozen section and try to diagnose the tumor
4 :
Yes, you're right. You cannot diagnose for certain without a biopsy. You may have a PET or CT that suggests, but you really don't have a histologic diagnosis till you get a biopsy. Even if she has a spot on her lung, doesn't mean she has primary lung cancer. Could be calcification, or could be breast cancer spread to the lung.
5 :
If the patient’s doctor suspects lung cancer, he or she will take a detailed medical history to check all the symptoms and assess the risk factors. The assessment of the patient’s medical history will be followed by a complete physical examination. The doctor will examine the patient’s throat to rule out other possible causes of hoarseness or coughing, and listen to the patient’s breathing and the sounds made when the patient’s chest and upper back are tapped (percussed). The physical examination, however, is not conclusive. If the doctor has reason to suspect lung cancer— particularly if the patient has a history of heavy smoking or occupational exposure to substances that are known to irritate the lungs—he or she may order a chest x ray to see if there are any masses in the lungs. Special imaging techniques, such as CT scans or MRIs, may provide more precise information about the possibility, size, shape, and location of any tumors. Sputum analysis involves microscopic examination of the cells that are either coughed up from the lungs, or are collected through a special instrument called a bronchoscope. Sputum analyses can diagnose at least 30% of lung cancers, some of which do not show up even on chest x rays. In addition, the test can help detect cancer in its very early stages, before it spreads to other regions. The sputum test does not, however, provide any information about the location of the tumor and must be followed by other tests, such as bronchoscopy, where machines can detect cancerous cells without the need to open the chest. Lung biopsy is the most definitive diagnostic tool for cancer. It can be performed in several different ways. The doctor can perform a bronchoscopy, which involves the insertion of a slender, lighted tube, called a bronchoscope, down the patient’s throat and into the lungs. In addition to viewing the passageways of the lungs, the doctor can use the bronchoscope to obtain samples of the lung tissue. In another procedure known as a needle biopsy, the location of the tumor first is identified using a CT scan or MRI. The doctor then inserts a needle through the chest wall and collects a sample of tissue from the tumor. In the third procedure, known as surgical biopsy, the chest wall is opened up and a part of the tumor, or all of it, is removed. A doctor who specializes in the study of diseased tissue (a pathologist) examines the tumor samples to identify the cancer’s type and stage.



Read more discussions :

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Why is painful lung action a common symptom of lung cancer

Why is painful lung action a common symptom of lung cancer?
I don't have lung cancer. Just homework in Science.
Cancer - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Because the lungs loose their elasticity as the disease attacks their cellular structure.
2 :
Lung cancer is such a debilitating disease. My nephew died from it last year and he was only 50. The cancer cells just eat up and destroy all the healthy tissue, invade the healthy cells and make them mutate with cancer. Your lungs have an abundance of elasticity in them and when this is destroyed, simple things like coughing can hurts. Sneezing because it cause a rush of air. They can no longer run and play hard sports because the heavy breathing alone causes difficulty for them because the lungs cannot properly move in a nice flowing motion because the elasticity is gone. At the onset of lung cancer, most don't know they have it and normal activities don't change, but as the disease progresses, the lungs become like leather, their color, which should be a nice pink, will more than likely be a nasty color. The alveoli which is air pockets that look like a bunch of grapes in your lungs, are bigger because of the strain to breath. Breathing becomes very painful but that's near the end. I watched my sister-in-law die from lung cancer. Hope this helps
3 :
Google lung cancer - my dad had lung cancer and got part of his lung removed and he had no pain, he had a cough for a few weeks and my mum nagged him to see a doctor, he survived but died 3 years later of bowel cancer, as for your question a pain in the lung could mean lots of things, emphysema, chest infection, asthma, pneumonia etc. Google Pain in the Lungs



Read more discussions :

Why does it matter where you get lung cancer

Why does it matter where you get lung cancer?
Why does it matter where you get lung cancer? It kills all the same.
Cancer - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Hi: I had my left lung removed due to small cell carsinoma. I am a non smoker. And you can also get lung cancer from asbestos but I use to work in a smokey casino in las vegas. but I got it and I am not going to give up My lung was removed July 2004. So never give up. And if you have a family member with it I would recomend that he or she see a onicologest and do treatments as well as surgery if they can. But never give up because of the word Cancer...
2 :
Not sure what you mean by "where" you get lung cancer. Obviously you know that lung cancer is in lung tissue (at least I hope you know) but what do you mean by "where"? If what you really meant to say is "Why does it matter where in or on your body you get cancer?", then it matters a lot. Some cancers have a higher cure rate than others, some are more aggressive than others, some metastasize more readily, some are slow-growing and some respond better to treatment. A lot depends on the primary site.
3 :
I'm assuming you're referring to the lung cancerous cells spreading to other parts of the body? This is called metastasis or advanced metastatic lung cancer. What happens in this case is that the cancer that originally started in the lungs is no longer localized to the lungs, but has gotten into the lymph/blood system and spread to other organs. The cancerous lung cells plant themselves in other parts of the body and start to grow. This is worse than localized lung cancer, so it's more likely to kill. Surgery alone wouldn't be enough to remove the spread cancer. Having localized cancer of any form is better for survival chances, as it can be operated on and removed, then possibly treated with chemo/radiation/immunotherapy in just that area to ensure the cancer is killed.
4 :
Well if you get cancer while at work, then it becomes a workers compensation deal, and then your old employer will have to pay at least part of the cost of the casket. They also need to continue your wages for a while, during the time that you are away from work getting treatment, unless they can prove that your asbestosis was caused by something away from work, like asbestos sprayed on ceilings in your home or something like that. Proving that you get lung cancer at work is more difficult in some states than others. For instance, in Oregon, it is much more difficult for the employee to prove it happened at work, while in California, it is more difficult for the employer to prove it did not happen at work. So yes it does matter where you are when they discover the cancer, and if you got it at work or while at home, or on your recreation time. Yes I am making fun of a serious subject. I hope someone got a laugh out of this - they where probably having a pretty bad day otherwise, I hope it got a chuckle out of them. My Personal History With Cancer: I started to learn about Lung Cancer when I was only 9. By 10, I knew what it is like to lose a parent to lung cancer, and by 18 I can tell you I had first hand experience in losing both parents. Funny, they say in a household where both parents smoke, that one or two of the kids might also smoke. Seems that non of the kids, and most of the grandkids never took an interest in smoking. I personally can not touch a cigarette, even the thought of it makes me uncomfortable. More recently, I have had two friends with life threatening cancer, and both have fully recovered. They used to have very high PSA counts, but that readout is now 0. They both used to get yearly screening for cancer, but the doctor said "Keep up the good work, you don't need to come back for 2 years". You see killing cancer cells is not difficult anymore. Once we began to understand how they multiply, and what environment the cancer cells multiply best in, then change to un-fertile environment, and the cancer will die off. When they test the blood of a cancer patient, they are all to acidic. Good Luck!
5 :
It doesn't matter where you get it or how you get it, its a very hard cancer to overcome and the odds are certainly against us. Not impossible for some to overcome lung cancer, but most can certainly be terminal. Personally my docs don't have an answer on how I got it, all they can tell me is that mine isn't going to go away. that doesn't mean I won't fight it til my last breath.
6 :
A lot depends on the kind of lung cancer. My mom was diagnosed with small cell in June of 2006 and died three months later. However, her brother was diagnosed with lung cancer (not small cell) in 1986, had a lung removed, underwent radiation, and lived for 21 more years before he died of heart related conditions.



 Read more discussions :