Friday, November 28, 2008

What are the effects of large quantitys of morphine on lung cancer patients

What are the effects of large quantitys of morphine on lung cancer patients?
I've heard morphine overdosing can kill you, but what about large doses of morphine taken regularly (and sometimes excessively) over a long period of time - to ease the agonizingly sharp breathing pains that lung cancer patients have? Also, are there any other (safe and similarly effective) drugs that can be used as an alternative for morphine?
Cancer - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
First of all, overdosing of any medication can kill you including tylenol. As far as morphine there is a controversy on that. Morphine or any opiate in large doses suppressing breathing. In the case of lung cancer patients, it's a good pain medication. The controversy is that morphine also extends life by about a few minutes. Not much but it's to prove that it doesn't kill a person when given in normal doses. .Another drug that has similar effect would be Dilaudid, which is called hydromorphone. That's the closest thing to Morphine.




 Read more discussions :

Monday, November 24, 2008

What is the right kind of food for an advanced lung cancer patient

What is the right kind of food for an advanced lung cancer patient?
My father is in the final stages of lung cancer and is having sever direaha, I was wondering if there was a website out there that would give us some ideas on the right kinds of food to feed him so that he is more comfortable?
Cancer - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
This is probably too obvious, but have you asked his doctor for some medication? If your Dad is in the final stages but still has an appetite, I'd want him to be eating his favorite things. But diarrhea can be controlled by meds. I'm very sorry for you and your Dad and wish you peace.
2 :
try to add some probiotics to whatever you can get him to eat or drink.....it will help with the diarrhea and hopefully that will provide some level of comfort for him.....vitamin enriched smoothies are a good source of nutrition, All in One makes an excellent powder vitamin that can easily be mixed in liquids.
3 :
Sorry about your father. You should talk to the Dr. or nurse about his diet. I would guess anything would be ok as long as it is not over seasoned. Soups, stews etc...
4 :
Talk to the doc first, but I would try some anti diareah meds. At the end of my life I would be wanting to eat all the things I loved, and would take any med that would allow me to do so. Also, it may seem odd, but is he getting enough fluids? Sometimes not having enough will cause diareah. And, adding more fiber. Get like the powdered fiber you can add to foods or drinks. Ofcourse, speak to the doc first.
5 :
check out this site below it should give you a good idea of what to feed your father to help him feel at ease and good luck



 Read more discussions :

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Can you get lung cancer from one of your famliy members that smokes and you dont

Can you get lung cancer from one of your famliy members that smokes and you dont?
My dad smokes since he was 18 years old. Can I get lung cancer from him even if i dont smoke?
Cancer - 35 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
yes. that's called secondhand smoke
2 :
second hand smoke is worse than actually smoking.. or so i've heard
3 :
no the british have long know that secondhand smoke is annoying not deadly
4 :
i think only if it runs in your family
5 :
Yes u could second hand smoke cancer
6 :
Yes, it's called Secondhand smoke, and it's just as dangerous as smoking yourself.
7 :
Yes. From second hand smoke.
8 :
yes, like what the first person said
9 :
if he smokes a lot yeah, its bad for you
10 :
Either directly from his genes if he has that predisposition or indirectly as in second hand smoke.
11 :
yeah if you are always around them sencond hand smoke it's it's more dangerous for you then them that smoke
12 :
you can get lung cancer from passive smoking. by the way, lung cancer does not only occur in smokers. I know a friend...who is a health freak... being diagnosed with lung cancer.
13 :
you sure can second hand smoke is the worst you might as well be a smoker
14 :
second hand smoke is worse than actually smoking
15 :
Yes, it is reported that second hand smoke is just as bad if not worse for your lungs
16 :
possibly.. bc they have a filter in their ciggarette.. and the smoke that comes out of it that WE smell.. it's not filtered.. and it hurts us more than them.. so yea, it's possible.. unfortunately. =(
17 :
yes, its called second hand smoke...it is worse than actually smoking yourself...(not saying that you should go out and start smoking b/c you live w/ somebody who smokes)...but instead try and get that person to stop
18 :
Yes, passive smokers can contract cancer, even if they do not smoke. It has been shown that many people that were non smokers, but worked in smoke-filled environments like clubs and pubs, contracted cancer by inhaling the smoke from other people's cigarettes.
19 :
Definitely. Its second hand smoke and its deadly.
20 :
yup thats the part that really sucks about smoking.....not only are you damaging your lungs but all the lungs around you too
21 :
If u are around his fumes often, yes u can get get it, take it from me, I just got through cancer treatments.
22 :
ABSOLUTELY!!! ...2nd hand smoke causes more lung cancer than smoking it yourself. I have several patients that have lung cancer, and its not a pretty thing! get him to quit or at least go outside....thats a terrible thing to do to your child!
23 :
Yes, you can. If you're constantly around people/areas that have lots of smoke in them, and you consistently breathe all the bad air in, the tar and chemicals in the smoke will give you something called second-hand smoking. This means that because of the people around you that were smoking so much, your lungs were badly damaged cause of it. If i were you, i'd encourage your dad to stop smoking.. it's really bad for him, but im sure you know that already.. hope i helped :)
24 :
Well, if you hang around him alot when hes smoking and breathe in all that smoke, then yeah, it may affect you. Although im not really sure if it can give you lung cancer, secondhand smoke is very dangerous since your breathing in PURE smoke, when in the other hand the one thats actually smoking is not.
25 :
I lived at MD Anderson Cancer Hospital with my Mother for 3 months and every person that I met that had lung cancer never smoked and were not around smokers. I met two that got the cancer after they quit smoking and their family members did not have any lung problems. No. I don't smoke. I did witness this first hand. This is government propaganda. Why do you think they want to fund children's health care on cigarette tax? Do you really believe that they would fund health care on Americans ill health. If funded on a cigarette tax they are promoting smoking. Use the brain that God gave you, if a smoker breathes in the smoke then exhales it he/she is also breathing in second hand smoke, so if they have less chance (according to others on this site) of getting lung cancer than someone who doesn't smoke, how does that promote lung cancer in non-smokers? that was made up by non-smokers who don't like the smell. Always remember that someone out there in this world won't like something that you do and will try to take it from you because they don't like it, use it , or need it, but you might. And this applies to everything in life not just smoking.
26 :
non smokers have the greater possibility of getting lung cancers than smokers
27 :
40% of lung cancer occurs in non-smokers and former smokers.
28 :
yes its called passive smoking a few people here in england have died from passive smoking .altho they never smoked in their life
29 :
Passive smoking is more dangerous and this is the reason for the govt. to ban smoking in the public.
30 :
You can get lung cancer from second hand smoke, ut you can also get lun cancer regardless. My Uncle died from lung cancer, he never smoked and wasn't around anyone that smoked....
31 :
As many have stated already, this is populary known as second hand smoke. What makes it so deadly is that most people think they must be the smoker. Not true. If you are around smokers when they smoke or are in a smoky room you imbibe some of the nicotine and other junk into your lungs when you inhale. This is why many cities outlaw smoking in restraunts now. The best thing you can do is leave the room the minute someone lights up and demand to eat in the non-smoking sections of restraunts. Your dad can always go outside and smoke. Below in the sources section is a Washington Post site for a video report put out by the U.S. Surgeon General on second hand smoke.
32 :
Yes, unfortunately, Dana Reeve, Christopher Reevs wife recently died of lung cancer and never smoked a day of her life. Even though he's your dad you can make the choice to not be around him when he smokes.
33 :
Yes you can get cancer from that...but it doesn't have to be from smoking. Anyone can get cancer and they may not ever have been exposed to second hand smoke or smoked a cigarette ever in their lives.
34 :
Secondhand smoke can increase your risk for lung cancer, yes, but as long as you stay away from his cigarette smoke your risk will not be elevated.
35 :
Absolutely. Second hand smoke has taken many lives, unfortunately.




Read more discussions :

Sunday, November 16, 2008

My mother has lung cancer and her tumor marker came back with a count of 80. How high can it go

My mother has lung cancer and her tumor marker came back with a count of 80. How high can it go?
She was diagnosed over 3 years ago with lung cancer. She did not want chemo or radiation. She drinks colloidal silver and swears by it. I tried to find a site with a tumor marker scale but could not.
Cancer - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
http://www.uihealthcare.com/topics/medicaldepartments/cancercenter/tumormarker/index.html
2 :
I am sorry to hear about your mother. If you want to help her, Google "Johanna Budwig". This woman was nominated for the Nobel Prize several times for her methods of treating *and curing* cancer. She wasn't a new age crackpot, she was a medical scientist. Her methods got rid of mine (stage 4 Melanoma) and they sure beat surgery and Chemo.




Read more discussions :

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Why are some people so insensitive to people with lung cancer

Why are some people so insensitive to people with lung cancer?
I have a friend who drank alcohol and smoked for years. You really couldn't find a nicer person. When he got lung cancer, somebody said he got what he deserved. Nobody deserves lung cancer even if they made bad choices. he was in a ton of pain when somebody said that.
Cancer - 7 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
to the person that doesn't have a disease like cancer,they haven't the slightest idea what the ones with it are going through =the people cannot feel the pain,the shortness of breath and the fear that comes along with cancer
2 :
You are right nobody deserves that kind of treatment, my good friends father has just been diagnosed w/ lung cancer, it is an awful, painful, cancer. and why does he deserve this cancer? because he smokes? Come on now, what about the people who get lung cancer who dont smoke? Some people are so insensative.
3 :
All I can say is to those who show no compassion and empathy none will be shown to them in their time of need. My father-in-law passed at the age of 54 from lung cancer and he never smoked a day in his life, nor were there any smokers in the home. Back in the day men worked with asbestos without protection gear and that is how his drs. feel he got sick with it. In my opinion it doesnt matter how a person lived their life when they are on their death bed compassion and empathy is a must. I mean really we will all make that lonely walk (some by self-destruction, some by accident, and some by natural causes) and we all know we will want others to feel compassion and empathy in our time of sorrow. I am so sorry your friend had to endure such cruelty from others. No doubt he is in a better place. Keep your head up!
4 :
Some people are insensitive because they have decided that a person with lung cancer has brought this on themselves. They are right about that but no one "deserves" this. It's a consequence of a certain lifestyle not a just reward or a punishment.
5 :
No, i dont believe anybody deserves such a horrible disease, but i can see were they are coming from. You friend knew the chances, as does everyone else who smokes, drinks or does bad things to their bodies. My brother has cancer, yet hes never smoked in his life, he was healthy and fit so he doesnt deserve it either, more so then your friend.
6 :
I think most people correlate lung cancer with smoking, and so people make unkind remarks, thinking their behavior was the problem. Yes smoking certainly causes lung cancer, there are alot of other things that can cause it also, that are not smoking related. I think many people are ignorant of cancer, and it's easier to say, "well, he should have known", then to say "how can I help". My mom is dying of lung cancer, yes a smoker, for 60yrs. She too is kind, and giving, and would never say to someone dying, "well you should have known better". People make choices in their lives, they marry early, divorce often, experiment with drugs/alcohol, drag race cars, skydive and basejump, to name just a few risky behaviours. None of those choices make that person less worthy. So in the end, I still believe it's ignorance, and people thinking it will never happen to them, won't they be surprised when it is, and the ignorance comes back to visit them. I'm sure their take on life and death will have a far different message when they are the one dying.
7 :
I must tell you that these people who judge your friend are cruel and insensitive. Most people who make such cruel judgments do not want you to know that they themselves have made plenty of bad choices, and become haughty and arrogant just because you do not know their own secret life choices. Many people get lung cancer who have never smoked in their life....and remember this, many people who were smokers, and who developed lung cancer....would have developed it anyway, even it they had never smoked a cigarette in their life! You just tell those big mouths..."Judge not!" For one day, their evil judging words WILL come back to haunt them! Best of luck and good wishes for your friend. He is loved.





 Read more discussions :

Saturday, November 8, 2008

What is the correct definition of lung cancer

What is the correct definition of lung cancer?
I searched up the definition of lung cancer, and went to many websites and they all give me a different meaning of the word.
Cancer - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Lung cancer is broken into 2 main catagories. Small Cell and Non Small Cell. Although it is uncommon, it is possible that characteristics of both types of lung cancer are present. If this happens, it is called a mixed small cell-large cell carcinoma. In addition to the two main types of lung cancer, other rare types such as sarcomas, and lymphomas can also occur. Named for the small round cells that make up this cancer, small cell lung cancer accounts for a much smaller percentage of lung cancer cases than non-small cell lung cancer. SCLC is broken down into three different categories. Small cell carcinoma, mixed small call/large cell carcinoma and combined small cell carcinoma. Each of these different types of lung cancer grows and spread in a different way. Because the cancer cells multiply quickly, SCLC often spreads throughout the body, and although the main cause of SCLC is smoking, there are other risk factors as well, including exposure to second hand smoke, asbestos and radon. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Non-small cell lung cancer or (NSCLC) is a much more common form of lung cancer. NSCLC can be broken down into three different types of lung cancer based on the size, shape and chemical composition of the cancer. These types are squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma. Squamous cell carcinoma is often associated with smoking and is generally found near a bronchus. Unlike squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma is usually found around the outer regions of the lung. Adenocarcinoma is the most common form of NSCLC - especially among women. Large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma can appear in any part of the lung, and often grows and spreads quickly. The symptoms and risk factors linked to non-small cell carcinoma are very similar to those associated with small cell lung cancer, however, these different types of lung cancer are often treated differently.




 Read more discussions :

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

When you start smoking, how long will it take for you to develop lung cancer

When you start smoking, how long will it take for you to develop lung cancer?
Is it possible to smoke and never develop lung cancer? I don't smoke but my daughter and son-in-law do .They are so young, I wish they would quit.Just curious about how long it takes to develop lung cancer once you start smoking...Lana
Cancer - 15 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
you get it the day you started
2 :
There's no set time. You can never smoke AND then get lung cancer ie Dana Reeves. It's also possible to smoke and never get cancer of the lung, however you could get cancer of the throat instead.
3 :
I don't think anyone knows how long it will take a smoker to develop lung cancer.. I think that there are other health risks that will adversely impact a smoker's health before the cancer and that would be emphysema
4 :
It depends on the age they started and the packs of cigarettes they consume. But they sure are a candidate if they don't quit. And if they live with you, you could get lung cancer too,. because sometimes the one who smell it are most likely to get it than the ones using it.
5 :
Everyone has the cancer cells, it just takes a kick to start them up, smoke, and you will increase your chances of the kick-start 5 fold.I am sure your daughter and son in law are old enought to know the dangers,but as we all tend to think, "it will never happen to me" It's not just lung cancer, try furring of the veins for a hart attack, shortness of breath, cancer of the throat,stained teeth, bad stinking breath, the list is endless.
6 :
I think that it can be possible depending on how long the person would live, but even it doesn't generates lung cancer it affects the lung which losses it normal functioning. But depending on the person it can happen very quickly or it can take years.
7 :
Lana, Everyone is different in response to their development of disease. Some people who've never smoked but who have been around smokers (ie: second hand smoke) have developed cancer. Some people who've smoked for years never develop lung cancer. But you have a 100 x greater chance of developing it if you DO smoke. Not to mention you'll get sicker more often...with respiratory illnesses like bronchitis and/or pneumonia. Smoking paralyzes the cilia in your lungs, not allowing them to work to remove airborne junk that would normally be coughed or sneezed out. Just don't EVER let them smoke in your home, around you, OR AROUND THEIR CHILDREN if they have any. Tell them how much you wish they'd stop. Hopefully they'll listen. Good luck.
8 :
3 days
9 :
It depends on the family history on cancer. But some people can smoke their whole lives and live to be over 100 yrs. old, while others are not as fortunate and get cancer, emphisyma(spelling?), etc. earlier on.
10 :
tell them the more time that passes the harder it is to quit,,the nictene patch did not work for me,,i try to quit several times unsucsessfully,,i dont have cancer yet,,but i got asthma,you can have other health rish associated with smoking not just cancer,stroke heart attack,,buy them patches for christmas maybe it work for them
11 :
In my experience, I have seen people in their 90's who have smoked all of their life and have not gotten lung cancer but usually they have some chronic obstructive pulmonary disease like emphysema. I have also known quite a few people who were heavy smokers and died of lung cancer in their 40's and 50's. I also have had quite a few friends who have died from lung cancer in their 50's and 60's who never smoked a day in their lives. Smoking definetly increases your risk for lung cancer and emphysema and other forms of cancer too. There is no set time though as to when you might develop the disease. Smoking is a bad habit that most people find offensive and odiferous not to mention the cost of cigarettes. Why start? Encourage them to quit!
12 :
it is uncertain but it gives a chance of developing lung cancer. Solution- QUIT!!!!
13 :
There are many factors (not just smoking) that can cause a person to develop lung cancer. Daily life can expose a person to many carcinogens. How a person lives and eats can determine which road their health will take. So if someone is a smoker it's wise to defend against it with a healthy diet rich in anti-oxidants. Not every smoker develops lung cancer.
14 :
Hi, Great post! Quitting smoking was the hardest thing I've ever done in my life, and I thought I wasn't addicted! Here's what I tried before finding success: hypnosis, those fake cigaretts, the nicotine patch, and group therapy....none worked. I finally tried this HERBAL patch I bought 6 months ago on the net. They claim a 97% success rate. Well, it worked! They had a sweet deal which was a free 10 day trial for only $3.95 including shipping (it's regularly $53 for 10 days)!! I don't know if they still have that deal, but it's worth a try. http://www.alllsite.info/stop-smoking-free.php Good Luck
15 :
never. donnt listen to the govenment. everyone is my family smokes and they have all lived to at least 85. my grAMPA lived to 97 and smoked 4 packs a day since he was 10.




Read more discussions :

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Which would be a good topic to research on Lung Cancer or Tuberculosis

Which would be a good topic to research on Lung Cancer or Tuberculosis?
You see, i have been researching and plus is there a cure for Lung Cancer? I can't research both and i just wanted a few suggestions. I really want know which disease is more dangerous and would be more important to research on currently in the 21st century. Thank you in advance!
Cancer - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
If you think there is a cure for lung cancer then you should do your research paper on that because the world needs to know and you obviously need to do more research so you stop making outlandish claims.
2 :
Not enough parameters given. Are you interested in the global or US public Health? Are you interested in the future or past 5 / 10 / 20 years? Are you interested in male/ female? White/black/...?
3 :
There are a lot of exciting new therapies for lung cancer, including vitamin C given IV. They don't know the cause for it, however. Smokers absolutely get emphysema and chronic bronchitis, but it's not certain they'll get cancer. Many never do. Many non-smokers do get lung cancer. They haven't found a particular gene like they have for breast cancer or a particular blood component like prostate cancer. If you're doing a research paper, I think you could find more information on TB. With HIV on the rise, TB has made a real come back. It's true that they can cure it in persons with intact immune systems, but it's very dangerous for others, and it has mutated into different strains now. My opinion is to research the one that interests you the most. In my experience, you'll do more digging for the answers and learn more if you're truly interested in the topic you're researching. Good luck...




 Read more discussions :